Coherence Engine Domain β
Overview β
The Coherence Engine domain provides mathematical AI interpretability capabilities for SPTFlo V3 through the prime-radiant plugin. It enables rigorous coherence validation, spectral stability analysis, and causal reasoning using advanced mathematical frameworks including Sheaf Cohomology, Spectral Graph Theory, and Do-Calculus.
Strategic Design β
Domain Vision β
Ensure mathematical coherence and stability across all AI operations through rigorous validation gates that prevent contradictions, detect hallucinations, and verify multi-agent consensus.
Core Subdomains β
Coherence Engine Domain
βββ Coherence Validation (Core) # Sheaf Laplacian contradiction detection
βββ Spectral Analysis (Core) # Stability and clustering analysis
βββ Causal Inference (Supporting) # Do-calculus interventional queries
βββ Consensus Verification (Core) # Multi-agent agreement validation
βββ Topology Analysis (Supporting) # Quantum topology features
βββ Type Theory (Generic) # HoTT proofs and verificationSubdomain Classification β
| Subdomain | Type | Complexity | Business Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coherence Validation | Core | High | Critical |
| Spectral Analysis | Core | High | High |
| Causal Inference | Supporting | High | Medium |
| Consensus Verification | Core | Medium | Critical |
| Topology Analysis | Supporting | High | Medium |
| Type Theory | Generic | High | Low |
Context Map β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β Coherence Engine Domain β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β Coherence Gate β β
β β (Central Validator) β β
β βββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββ β
β β β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββΌββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β β β β
β βΌ βΌ βΌ β
β βββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββ β
β β Cohomology β β Spectral β β Causal β β
β β Engine β β Engine β β Engine β β
β βββββββββββββββββ€ βββββββββββββββββ€ βββββββββββββββββ€ β
β β β’ Sheaf β β β’ Eigenvalue β β β’ Do-calculus β β
β β Laplacian β β computation β β β’ Confounders β β
β β β’ Energy β β β’ Spectral β β β’ Backdoor β β
β β calculation β β gap β β paths β β
β βββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββ β
β β β β β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββΌββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β β
β βΌ β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β Supporting Services β β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ β
β β β’ Quantum Engine β β
β β β’ Category Engine β β
β β β’ HoTT Engine β β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β
Integration with SPTFlo V3
β
ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β β β
βΌ βΌ βΌ
βββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββ
β Memory β β Coordination β β Security β
β Domain (V3) β β Domain (V3) β β Domain (V3) β
βββββββββββββββββ€ βββββββββββββββββ€ βββββββββββββββββ€
β Shared Kernel β β Shared Kernel β β Conformist β
β (Pre-storage β β (Consensus β β (Input β
β coherence β β verification)β β validation) β
β gate) β β β β β
βββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββ βββββββββββββββββIntegration Relationships β
| Coherence Context | V3 Domain | Relationship | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coherence Validation | Memory | Shared Kernel | Pre-storage coherence gate |
| Spectral Analysis | Coordination | Shared Kernel | Swarm stability metrics |
| Consensus Verification | Hive-Mind | Shared Kernel | Mathematical consensus check |
| Causal Inference | Security | Conformist | Attack pattern analysis |
| Topology Analysis | Memory | Customer-Supplier | Vector cluster analysis |
Bounded Contexts β
1. Coherence Validation Context β
Responsibility: Detect contradictions using Sheaf Laplacian energy
Core Concepts:
- Sheaf Laplacian: Mathematical operator measuring local-to-global consistency
- Coherence Energy: Scalar value (0=coherent, 1=contradictory)
- Violation Detection: Identification of specific contradictory elements
Ubiquitous Language:
- Coherent: Energy < 0.3, no significant contradictions
- Warning Zone: Energy 0.3-0.7, minor inconsistencies
- Contradictory: Energy > 0.7, major contradictions
- Coherence Gate: Validation checkpoint before storage
Key Operations:
// Check coherence of vector set
checkCoherence(vectors: Float32Array[]): CoherenceResult
// Validate memory entry against context
validate(entry: MemoryEntry, context: MemoryEntry[]): CoherenceValidation
// Batch validation with progressive context
validateBatch(entries: MemoryEntry[]): CoherenceValidation[]2. Spectral Analysis Context β
Responsibility: Analyze stability using spectral graph theory
Core Concepts:
- Eigenvalues: Characteristic values of adjacency matrix
- Spectral Gap: Difference between first and second eigenvalues
- Stability Index: Aggregate stability measure
Ubiquitous Language:
- Spectrally Stable: Positive spectral gap > 0.1
- Clustering Tendency: Low second eigenvalue indicates clusters
- Connectivity: First eigenvalue indicates overall connectivity
Key Operations:
// Compute eigenvalues of adjacency matrix
computeEigenvalues(adjacencyMatrix: Float32Array): Float32Array
// Analyze stability of a system
analyzeSpectral(adjacencyMatrix: Float32Array): SpectralResult
// Detect clustering patterns
detectClusters(adjacencyMatrix: Float32Array): ClusterResult3. Causal Inference Context β
Responsibility: Do-calculus based causal reasoning
Core Concepts:
- Causal Graph: DAG representing causal relationships
- Intervention: do(X=x) operator for causal queries
- Confounders: Variables affecting both treatment and outcome
- Backdoor Paths: Non-causal paths creating spurious correlation
Ubiquitous Language:
- Treatment: Intervention variable
- Outcome: Effect variable to measure
- Causal Effect: True effect of intervention (vs correlation)
- Valid Intervention: No unblocked backdoor paths
Key Operations:
// Estimate causal effect
estimateEffect(treatment: string, outcome: string, graph: CausalGraph): number
// Identify confounding variables
identifyConfounders(treatment: string, outcome: string, graph: CausalGraph): string[]
// Find backdoor paths
findBackdoorPaths(treatment: string, outcome: string, graph: CausalGraph): string[][]4. Consensus Verification Context β
Responsibility: Mathematical validation of multi-agent agreement
Core Concepts:
- Agent State Vectors: Embedding representations of agent positions
- Agreement Ratio: Fraction of agents in consensus
- Coherence Check: Cross-agent consistency validation
Ubiquitous Language:
- Consensus Achieved: Agreement ratio > threshold AND coherent
- Verified Consensus: Mathematically validated agreement
- Byzantine Tolerance: Resilience to faulty agents
Key Operations:
// Verify consensus mathematically
verifyConsensus(agentStates: AgentState[]): ConsensusVerification
// Check vote coherence
checkVoteCoherence(votes: Vote[]): CoherenceResult
// Analyze agreement patterns
analyzeAgreement(agentStates: AgentState[]): AgreementAnalysis5. Topology Analysis Context β
Responsibility: Quantum topology for structural analysis
Core Concepts:
- Betti Numbers: Topological invariants (b0=components, b1=loops, b2=voids)
- Persistence Diagram: Birth-death pairs of topological features
- Homology Classes: Equivalence classes of cycles
Ubiquitous Language:
- Connected Components: Betti number b0
- Cycles/Loops: Betti number b1
- Voids/Cavities: Betti number b2
- Persistent Feature: Long-lived topological structure
Key Operations:
// Compute Betti numbers
computeBettiNumbers(points: Float32Array[], dimension: number): number[]
// Generate persistence diagram
computePersistenceDiagram(points: Float32Array[]): [number, number][]
// Count homology classes
countHomologyClasses(points: Float32Array[], dimension: number): number6. Type Theory Context β
Responsibility: Homotopy Type Theory proofs and verification
Core Concepts:
- Type: Classification of values
- Proof: Evidence of proposition truth
- Normal Form: Canonical representation of term
Ubiquitous Language:
- Type Judgment: Statement that term has a type
- Proof Verification: Checking proof validity
- Type Inference: Deriving type from term structure
Key Operations:
// Verify a proof
verifyProof(proposition: string, proof: string): boolean
// Infer type of a term
inferType(term: string): string
// Normalize a term
normalize(term: string): stringEngine Inventory β
Total: 6 Mathematical Engines β
| Engine | Purpose | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| CohomologyEngine | Sheaf Laplacian coherence | <5ms per check |
| SpectralEngine | Eigenvalue stability | <20ms for 100x100 |
| CausalEngine | Do-calculus inference | <10ms per query |
| QuantumEngine | Persistent homology | <50ms per computation |
| CategoryEngine | Functor/morphism ops | <5ms per operation |
| HottEngine | Type theory proofs | <10ms per verification |
Memory Namespaces β
All Coherence Engine data is stored under the pr/ namespace prefix:
| Namespace | Purpose | Description |
|---|---|---|
pr/coherence-checks | Validation history | Records of coherence validations |
pr/stability-metrics | Stability data | Swarm stability measurements |
pr/causal-models | Causal graphs | Stored causal relationship models |
pr/topology-features | Topological data | Computed topological features |
Integration Points β
Memory Domain β
- Hook:
pre-memory-store- Coherence gate before storage - Service:
CoherentMemoryService- Extended memory with coherence
Hive-Mind Domain β
- Hook:
pre-consensus- Consensus coherence validation - Hook:
post-swarm-task- Stability analysis after tasks - Service:
CoherentHiveMind- Extended hive-mind with verification
Security Domain β
- Hook:
pre-rag-retrieval- Hallucination prevention - Integration: Input validity checking via coherence
AIDefence Domain β
- Extension: Coherence-based threat detection
- Integration: Mathematical attack pattern analysis